Meta changes Messenger’s LGBT-themed names, embracing a fresh approach

Meta, the parent company of Facebook, is making changes to its policies regarding hate speech and freedom of expression. However, some of these changes have already sparked controversy. One of the recent changes is related to the themes available on Messenger, which users can choose to personalize their conversations. Previously, the platform included themes associated with the LGBTQ+ community. But now, due to Meta’s policy changes, the names of these themes are also being altered.

With these changes, the themes will no longer use names associated with the LGBTQ+ groups. Instead, they will use more generic terms. For example, the “Pride” theme will now be called “Rainbow,” and “Transgender” will be referred to as “Cotton Candy.”

It’s worth noting that the LGBTQ+ themes were introduced on Messenger back in 2022 as part of the platform’s social initiative towards these communities. However, following these recent changes, the original announcement about the themes has been removed from the platform.

Interestingly, these changes came after Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta, made statements about his intention to align some of the company’s policies with those of the Donald Trump administration in the United States. Zuckerberg aims to make Meta’s policies more inclusive, but it seems that these changes have raised concerns among users.

The decision to remove the LGBTQ+-related names from the Messenger themes has sparked debates about the company’s commitment to supporting diversity and inclusivity. Critics argue that by replacing specific LGBTQ+ terms with generic ones, Meta is diluting the visibility and representation of these communities.

On the other hand, supporters of the changes argue that using more generic terms can help create a more inclusive environment for everyone. They believe that by avoiding specific labels, the themes can be enjoyed by a wider range of users without excluding or singling out any particular group.

While it’s important to acknowledge the efforts made by platforms like Messenger to promote inclusivity, it’s equally crucial to ensure that these efforts are not undermined or perceived as token gestures. The LGBTQ+ community, like any other marginalized group, deserves genuine representation and recognition.

In conclusion, Meta’s decision to change the names of the Messenger themes associated with the LGBTQ+ community has sparked controversy. While some argue that using more generic terms promotes inclusivity, others are concerned that this move dilutes the visibility of these communities. It remains to be seen how Meta will address these concerns and continue its commitment to supporting diversity and freedom of expression.