Meta faces legal troubles for allegedly using copyrighted data, including books from LibGen, to train their AI models without proper authorization.
- AI models are becoming more advanced and integrated into daily life
- OpenAI's GPT and Meta's Llama are two well-known and diverse AI models
- Meta's use of copyrighted data for training their models raises ethical concerns
Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly integrated into our daily lives, and as a result, more advanced models are being developed and trained on vast amounts of data. OpenAI’s GPT is probably one of the most well-known AI models, used in applications like ChatGPT. However, it’s not the only one out there. Meta has also joined the race with Llama, an open model that utilizes a diverse range of sources for training. But here’s the catch: the data used to train these AI models cannot be sourced without proper authorization, and it seems that Meta is now facing some legal troubles because of this.
A recent complaint was filed against Meta in a California court, accusing the company of using copyrighted data to train its AI models, specifically Llama. To make matters worse, it is alleged that Mark Zuckerberg himself approved this practice. According to the accusation, Meta allegedly used a tool called LibGen, known for collecting links from various sources, to gather data for training their models. However, among the data were numerous copyrighted materials, such as books available for download on the internet, which were also used to train Meta’s models.
Apparently, Meta had previously justified its use of LibGen for data collection, claiming that it had Zuckerberg’s permission. However, the new accusation goes even further, suggesting that Meta collected the training data without authorization and deliberately removed any references that could identify the source of the materials.
The current case accuses Meta of unlawfully using LibGen to collect data without taking the necessary measures to prevent the use of copyrighted content for model training.
This situation doesn’t reflect well on Meta, especially considering that even Yann LeCun, the head of Meta’s AI division, stated last year that authors should freely make their publications available for AI model training.
As of now, Meta has not provided any comments regarding the case.
About Our Team
Our team comprises industry insiders with extensive experience in computers, semiconductors, games, and consumer electronics. With decades of collective experience, we’re committed to delivering timely, accurate, and engaging news content to our readers.
Trending Posts
Gigabyte introduces AI-Enhanced B800 Motherboards for Intel and AMD at CES 2025
NVIDIA’s NIM Microservices and AI Blueprints Redefine Local AI Development
CyberLink introduces Generative AI and Editing Tools for Next-Gen PCs at CES 2025
CyberLink introduces On-Device AI Tools for Creative Editing at CES 2025
Pimax introduces Crystal Super, a High-Resolution VR Headset at CES 2025
Evergreen Posts
NZXT about to launch the H6 Flow RGB, a HYTE Y60’ish Mid tower case
Intel’s CPU Roadmap: 15th Gen Arrow Lake Arriving Q4 2024, Panther Lake and Nova Lake Follow
HYTE teases the “HYTE Y70 Touch” case with large touch screen
NVIDIA’s Data-Center Roadmap Reveals GB200 and GX200 GPUs for 2024-2025
Intel introduces Impressive 15th Gen Core i7-15700K and Core i9-15900K: Release Date Imminent